Audit of the Ottawa Police Service’s Response to the Convoy Protest – The Role of the Ottawa Police Services Board

Audit of the Ottawa Police Service’s Response to the Convoy Protest – The Role of the Ottawa Police Services Board

Objective

The objective of the audit was to assess whether the Ottawa Police Services Board (OPSB) undertook all necessary and appropriate action, leading up to and during the convoy protest, to fulfill its mandate to provide adequate and effective police services in the City of Ottawa. 

Scope

The scope of this audit was limited to OPSB’s role in the context of their responsibility of providing adequate and effective police services.  

The focus of this audit was to determine whether the OPSB obtained the details necessary to engage in a meaningful consultation with the Chief on matters concerning Board policies and the operational mandate of the Ottawa Police Service in responding to the convoy protest. This included assessing whether the Board’s actions were aligned with and satisfied its mandate and oversight responsibilities. 

Why we did this audit

Given the significant impact that the convoy protest had on the City of Ottawa and its residents, the Auditor General accepted a request from the Ottawa Police Services Board (OPSB or the Board) to conduct a review of the response of the Ottawa Police Service (OPS). This audit focused exclusively on assessing whether the OPSB undertook all necessary and appropriate actions leading up to and during the convoy protest to fulfill its mandate of providing adequate and effective police services in Ottawa.

 

 

 

What we found

We found that in the early stages of the protest, the Board did not clearly understand its role relative to a major event but sought out legal expertise and support to guide them through the rapidly changing event. As time went on and, in an attempt, to fulfill its mandate, the Board took steps to request operational information and asked questions of the Chief of Police; however, for most of the three-week convoy protest, this information was not provided, which impacted their ability to effectively undertake their oversight responsibilities.

Further, we noted that elements of the infrastructure supporting the Board have the potential to impact their overall effectiveness, including: skills and expertise, orientation and training and support available to Board members.

We made 11 recommendations to ensure:

  • Expectations are clarified on the collaboration between the Board and the Chief of Police during a major event;
  • There is sufficient due diligence and transparency when a non-standard hiring process is employed;
  • Expectations are clear related to dissemination of information by the Chair to the full Board;
  • All activities and decisions are executed in accordance with legislative and procedural requirements; and,
  • Board members have the skills, competencies, time commitments and support needed to effectively govern.
Scroll to top